Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

New Restriction on Models for Quasistellar Objects

Abstract

THE inverse Compton effect has recently received attention as a possible source of the continuous radiation of quasi-stellar objects1–3. Hoyle et al.4 concluded that quasi-stellar objects cannot be at cosmological distances because otherwise the inverse Compton effect would force the electrons to dump their relativistic energies in times so short that no known acceleration mechanism could be responsible for their original appearance. Modifications of this argument have been discussed by several authors5–9, in particular by Woltjer10, who considered a radiation (and electron) flux restricted to a narrow cone about the radial direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenstein, J. L., and Schmidt, M., Astrophys. J., 140, 1 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginzburg, V. L., Ozernoi, L. M., and Syrovatsky, S. I., Soviet Phys. Dokl., 9, 683 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shklovskii, I. S., Sov. Astro., 9, 683 (1966).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyle, F., Burbidge, G. R., and Sargent, W. L. W., Nature, 209, 751 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rees, M. J., Nature, 211, 805 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rees, M. J., and Sciama, D. W., Nature, 213, 374 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoyle, F., and Burbidge, G. R., Nature, 212, 1223 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillier, R. R., Nature, 212, 1334 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfleiderer, J., and Grewing, M., Science, 154, 1452 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Woltjer, L., Astrophys. J., 146, 597 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapitza, P. L., and Dirac, P. A. M., Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 29, 297 (1933).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Felten, J. E., and Morrison, P., Astrophys J., 146, 686 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burbidge, G. R., and Burbidge, E. M., in Quasistellar Objects (Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

OSTER, L. New Restriction on Models for Quasistellar Objects. Nature 217, 148–149 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/217148a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/217148a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing