Abstract
IN 1929, Watson1 pointed out that very close to the surface of the Earth the atmospheric electric current, in normal fine weather field, is carried only by positive ions, so that the current density can be computed from where J is the density of the current from ionosphere to Earth, Es is the electric field at the surface, and λ+s is the conductivity of the air at the surface due to positive ions. The electric field and the conductivity, however, are measured usually at a height of approximately 1 metre. The density of the current due to conductivity, Jc(1), at this height is whereE(1) is the electric field at 1 metre and λ±(1) is the conductivity due to positive and negative ions at 1 metre. The diffusion current is usually neglected and it is assumed that the current density is approximately equal to the density of the conduction current at 1 metre, so that it can be computed from equation (2). This assumption is supported by the observations of Nolan2,3 and Hogg4. It will be shown here that this assumption is not correct and that the current density should be estimated from This statement can be proved by three arguments which will be discussed here shortly.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watson, Geophys. Mem., No. 45 (Meteorol. Off. 1929).
Nolan, J. J., and Nolan, P. J., Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., 43 A. 79 (1935).
Nolan, P. J., Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., 46 A, 65 (1940).
Hogg, A. R., Commonwealth Solar Obs., Canberra, Mem. No. 7 (1939).
O'Donnell, G. A., J. Atmosph. Terr. Phys., 2, 201 (1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BUIS, P. Current Density Measurements in Atmospheric Electricity. Nature 216, 360–361 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216360a0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216360a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.