Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Binocular Depth Perception of “Julesz Patterns” viewed as Perfectly Stabilized Retinal Images

Abstract

THE role of eye movements in the promotion, and maintenance of binocular fusion and depth perception is not clear, although experiments1–3 suggest that judgements of depth in a stereoscopic situation may be made with some accuracy in the absence of eye movements. Langlands found reliable perception of depth in normal vision with short exposures of the order of 10−5 sec, but it seems uncertain whether judgements could have been influenced by after-images. It should be possible in principle to solve this problem by “stabilizing” images on the retina after the method of Ditchburn4 and Riggs5, and in 1963 one of us (C. R. E.) tried to study binocular vision with a contact lens stabilizing system in each eye, but with inconclusive results. Partial destabilization because of poor contact lens fit was a probable cause of this lack of success, as Barlow pointed out in a general criticism of this method6. Experiments with an after-image as a “perfectly stabilized image” have been undertaken here7, and, because with suitable methods prolonged clear after-images of patterns can be obtained, we decided to try to study complex stereoscopic patterns in these conditions. (Because the after-image is formed as the result of temporary changes in the state of the retinal cells themselves, it can be considered to be a completely “stabilized” image.)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langlands, N. M. S., MRC Special Report Series, 133 (HMSO, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ogle, K. N., and Reiher, L., Vision Res., 2, 439 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bower, T., Goldsmith, W. M., and Hochberg, J., Percept. Mot. Skills., 19, 510 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditchburn, R. W., and Ginsborg, B. L., Nature, 170, 36 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riggs, L. A., Ratcliff, R., Cornsweet, J. C., and Cornsweet, T. N., J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 43, 495(1953).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barlow, H. B., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 15, 36 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, C. R., Brit. J. Psychol.(in the press).

  8. Julesz, B., Bell System Tech. J., 39, 1125 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, R. J., and Wilsoncroft, W. E., Psychonomic Sci., 1, 267 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

EVANS, C., CLEGG, J. Binocular Depth Perception of “Julesz Patterns” viewed as Perfectly Stabilized Retinal Images. Nature 215, 893–895 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/215893b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/215893b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing