Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Barrier to Coalescence in Stabilized Emulsions

Abstract

ALTHOUGH emulsions of immiscible liquids are thermo-dynamically unstable, it is well known that the rate of coalescence may be reduced by adding small quantities of a third component (stabilizer) which is tensioactive. Many theories have tried to explain emulsion stability but none has been perfectly general. The most general theory is based on the stabilization of thin liquid films during approach of droplets as a result of the Gibbs–Marangoni effect1. This stabilizing effect may operate during the early stages of emulsion formation. Electrical repulsion must be a barrier to coalescence in emulsions stabilized by ionized detergents2, but many emulsions of high stability may be prepared in which no electrical potential barrier is believed to be present. The purely hypothetical “solvation barriers”3 cannot explain the stability of water/oil emulsions where the oil is a paraffin, for example, in which no orientation at the interfaces would be expected. A barrier resulting from the high viscosity of the stabilizing film4 cannot account for the high stability of emulsions stabilized by monolayers which do not increase the interfacial viscosity. The difficulty of flow of the continuous medium from thin films between approaching droplets results in a hydrodynamic barrier which would not be expected to be influenced very greatly by the presence of adsorbed monolayers. These latter two mechanisms do not offer an explanation of emulsion type.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van den Tempel, M., Proc. Third Intern. Cong. Surface Activity, 2, 573 (Cologne, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, J. T., and Rideal, E. K., in Interfacial Phenomena, 367 (Academic Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies, J. T., and Rideal, E. K., in Interfacial Phenomena, 369 (Academic Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielson, L. E., Wall, R., and Adams, G., J. Colloid Sci., 13, 441 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J., and Eyring, H., in The Theory of Rate Processes (McGraw-Hill, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bancroft, W. D., J. Phys. Chem., 17, 514 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander, A. E., in Adv. in Colloid Science, 3, (Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schulman, J. H., and Cockbain, E. G., Trans. Faraday Soc., 36, 651 (1940).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence, A. S. C., and Mills, O. S., Disc. Faraday Soc., 18, 98 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MACRITCHIE, F. Barrier to Coalescence in Stabilized Emulsions. Nature 215, 1159–1160 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2151159a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2151159a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing