Abstract
STABLE compounds of copper(O) appear to be unknown except for the barium salt of the complex acetylide anion [PhC≡C—Cu—Cu—C≡CPh]2− described by Nast et al.1 and perhaps a phthalocyanine complex2. Derivatives of copper(O) if monomeric should be paramagnetic (4s1 configuration) and, if dimeric, diamagnetic like the isoelectronic mercuric chloride. The dimeric acetylide copper(O) anion is indeed diamagnetic as is, presumably, the Cu2 molecule, which exists in equilibrium with copper atoms in the gas phase. The Cu2 molecule has a surprisingly high dissociation energy (45.5±2 kcal/mole), the corresponding value5 for Ag2 and Au2 being 39 and 51.5 kcal/mole respectively3. Nevertheless, the Cu2 species is thermodynamically unstable with respect to metallic copper, because for the reaction Cu2(g)→ 2Cu(C), ΔH = − 115.5 kcal. The stabilization of the Cu2 and Cu4 species has now been achieved using a variety of different ligands.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nast, R., Kirst, P., Beck, G., and Gremm, J., Chem. Ber., 96, 3302 (1963).
Watt, G. W., and Dawes, J. W., J. Inorg. Nuclear Chem., 14, 32 (1960).
Ackerman, M., Stafford, F. E., and Drowart, T., J. Chem. Phys., 33, 1784 (1960).
Mann, F. G., Purdie, D., and Wells, A. F., J. Chem. Soc., 1503 (1936).
Gillard, R. D., Ugo, R., Cariati, F., Cenini, S., and Bonati, F., Chem. Commun., 869 (1966).
Layton, A. J., Nyholm, R. S., Pneumaticakis, G. A., and Tobe, M. L., Chem. and Indust., 465 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LAYTON, A., NYHOLM, R., PNEUMATICAKIS, G. et al. Dimeric and Tetrameric Complexes of Copper(O). Nature 214, 1109–1110 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2141109b0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2141109b0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.