Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

2-Acetamidofluorene and 3-Methylcholanthrene: Differences in Binding to Rat Liver Deoxyribonucleic Acid in vivo

Abstract

THE relationship between mutagenesis and carcinogenesis is still a matter of controversy1. The problem is particularly unresolved with respect to liver cancer induced by chemicals. Although hepato-carcinogenic nitrosamines are known to alkylate liver DNA in vivo2, similar binding to liver DNA in vivo has not been reported for the two other most intensively studied groups of liver carcinogens, namely, the fiuorenamines and the aminoazo dyes. Although, at present, one cannot make definitive interpretations of the functional significance (with respect either to DNA replication or to DNA transcription) of the binding of a carcinogen to the DNA in a liver cell, studies are needed which correlate carcinogenicity of various compounds with their binding in vivo to gene material. This report describes the binding of the strongly hepato-carcinogenic agent 2-acetamidofluorene3 (N-2-fluorenylacetamide, AAF) to rat liver DNA after intra-peritoneal injection. In a parallel in vivo experiment the aromatic hydrocarbon, 3 (or 20) -methylcholanthrene (MC), which is not carcinogenic for rat liver4 (although it does cause significant alterations in both RNA5 and protein6 synthesis in this organ), was found not to bind to rat liver DNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burdette, W. J., Cancer Res., 15, 201 (1955); Symp. Action of Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Agents, J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 64, Suppl. 1 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Magee, P. N., and Farber, E., Biochem. J., 83, 114 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weisburger, E. K., and Weisburger, J. H., Adv. Cancer Res., 5, 331 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartwell, J. L., Survey of Compounds Which Have Been Tested for Carcinogenic Activity, second ed. (Washington, U.S. Public Health Service 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loeb, L. A., and Gelboin, H. V., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 52, 1219 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Conney, A. H., Miller, E. C., and Miller, J. A., Cancer Res., 16, 450 (1956); J. Biol. Chem., 228, 753 (1957). Gelboin, H. V., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 91, 130 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sporn, M. B., Wanko, T., and Dingman, W., J. Cell Biol., 15, 109 (1965). Dingman, C. W., and Sporn, M. B., Science, 149, 1251 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, W. D., Cline, G. B., and Anderson, N. G., Anal. Biochem., 9, 477 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kit, S., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 51, 198 (1961). Schildkraut, C., Marmur, J., and Doty, P., J. Mol. Biol., 4, 430 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, C. A., and Berns, K. I., J. Mol. Biol., 3, 277 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marroquin, F., and Farber, E., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 55, 403 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brookes, P., and Lawley, P. D., Nature, 202, 781 (1964). Brookes, P., and Lawley, P. D., J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 64, Suppl. 1, 111 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dingman, C. W., and Sporn, M. B., Science, 149, 1251 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SPORN, M., DINGMAN, C. 2-Acetamidofluorene and 3-Methylcholanthrene: Differences in Binding to Rat Liver Deoxyribonucleic Acid in vivo. Nature 210, 531–532 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/210531a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/210531a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing