Abstract
ALTHOUGH a considerable body of evidence exists indicating that solutes of a radical scavenging nature depress the yields of the principal products (hydrogen, cyclohexene, dicyclohexyl) from the gamma radiolysis of cyclohexane1, the effect of electron scavenging solutes is less well characterized. Scholes and Simic2 have shown that in the presence of nitrous oxide, a powerful electron but feeble hydrogen atom scavenger, the hydrogen yield is decreased by a factor of two (G(H2) = 2.78 at [N2O] = 100 mM), G(N2) being 3.75 at the same concentration. In the course of similar investigations on carefully de-aerated cyclohexane we have observed a marked increase in the gamma radiolysis yield of dicyclohexyl (see Table 1). The measured yields are independent of dose rate in the range 0.2–2.5 M rads/h and independent of nitrous oxide concentration in the range 15–130 mM. Impoverishment of nitrous oxide in the liquid phase was avoided by the use of low total doses (< 0.5 M rad) and by performing irradiations on samples in which gas–liquid equilibration was facilitated by a high surface to volume ratio of the liquid.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dyne, P. J., Smith, D. R., and Stone, J. A., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 14, 313 (1963).
Scholes, G., and Simic, M., Nature, 202, 895 (1964).
Blackburn, R., and Charlesby, A., Proc. Roy. Soc., A (in the press).
Okada, Y., J. Phys. Chem., 68, 2120 (1964).
Libby, W. F., J. Chem. Phys., 35, 1714 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BLACKBURN, R., CHARLESBY, A. Effect of an Electron-scavenging Solute on the Radiolysis of Cyclohexane. Nature 210, 1036–1037 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2101036a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2101036a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.