Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of Altered Perfusion Rates on the Retention of Noradrenaline by the Spleen

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 13 August 1966

Abstract

IN the majority of investigations concerning the mechanism of retention of circulating noradrenaline by tissues, the amine has been administered by intravenous injection. Noradrenaline itself, as well as a wide variety of physiological and pathological conditions, are known to exert profound effects on the flow of blood through tissues. It is important, therefore, to establish the effect of changes in flow rate on the uptake of circulating noradrenaline or that liberated by sympathetic nerve stimulation. The evidence in the literature on this point is conflicting. It has been shown that the greater the flow of blood through the organ, the greater is the amount of noradrenaline in the venous effluent following stimulation of the post-ganglionic sympathetic nerves to spleen1–3, intestine4 and skeletal muscle5. On the other hand, spontaneous changes in flow rate have been reported to be without effect on the retention of noradrenaline by the perfused heart6 and the perfused spleen7. Consequently, we have examined the effect of different, controlled flow rates on the uptake of tritiated noradrenaline by the perfused spleen.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, G. L., and Gillespie, J. S., J. Physiol. (Lond.), 138, 81 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakeley, A. G. H., Brown, G. L., and Ferry, C. B., J. Physiol. (Lond.), 167, 505 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hertting, G., and Schiefthaler, T., Arch. Exp. Path. Pharmak., 246, 13 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, G. L., Davies, B. N., and Gillespie, J. S., J. Physiol. (Lond.), 143, 41 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsson, A., Folkow, B., and Häggendal, J., Life Sciences, 3, 1335 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindmar, R., and Muscholl, E., Arch. Exp. Path. Pharmak., 247, 469 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillespie, J. S., and Kirpekar, S. M., J. Physiol. (Lond.), 176, 205 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, J. E., Horst, W. D., and Kopin, I. J., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 24, 477 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iverson, L. L., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 21, 523 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iverson, L. L., J. Physiol. (Lond.), 175, 71P (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iverson, L. L., quoted by Zaimis, E., J. Physiol. (Lond.), 177, 35P (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Potter, L. T., Cooper, T., Willman, V. L., and Wolfe, D. E., Circ. Res., 16, 468 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hertting, G., Proc. Sec. Intern. Pharm. Meeting, 3, 277 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wurtman, R. J., Kopin, I. J., Horst, D., and Fischer, J. E., Amer. J. Physiol., 207, 1247 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, P. O., Statistical Methods in Research, 62 (Prentice Hall, New York, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A corrigendum to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/211674b0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PATON, D., GILLIS, C. Effect of Altered Perfusion Rates on the Retention of Noradrenaline by the Spleen. Nature 208, 391–392 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/208391a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/208391a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing