Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Non-acoustic Factors influencing Activity of Middle Ear Muscles in Waking Cats

Abstract

THE intensity of sound transmitted from the ear drum to the inner ear can be attenuated by contraction of the middle ear muscles, the tensor tympani and stapedius. These muscles contract at the onset of sound, thereby reducing the size of cochlear microphonics as recorded at the round window. Previous explanations of middle ear muscle activity have only considered possible acoustic functions1–4. However, in waking, unrestrained cats, we have found middle ear muscle activity related to non-acoustic factors, for example, bodily movement and vocalization. In animals that we have experimentally deafened by crushing both eight nerves, non-acoustic contractions persist in association with bodily movement and vocalization. In these animals all acoustic middle ear muscle activity is absent, the neural component is absent from the cochlear response recorded at the round window, and they show no behavioural reaction to loud sounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hallpike, C. S., J. Laryng. Otol., 50, 363 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilding, D. A., and Fletcher, J. L., Intern. Rec. M., 173, 369 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiggers, H. C., Amer. J. Physiol., 120, 771 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simmons, F. B., and Beatty, D. L., Science, 138, 590 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Starr, A., and Livingston, R., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 716 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klockhoff, I., Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm), Supp. 164, 32 (1961).

  7. Kato, T., pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., 150, 569 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hugelin, A., Dumont, S., and Paillas, N., Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol., 12, 797 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernandez-Peon, R., Scherrer, H., and Jouvet, M., Science, 123, 331 (1956).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons, F. B., and Beatty, D. L., Science, 138, 590 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carmel, P., and Starr, A., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 598 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CARMEL, P., STARR, A. Non-acoustic Factors influencing Activity of Middle Ear Muscles in Waking Cats. Nature 202, 195–196 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202195a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202195a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing