Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Meteoritic Tritium and Diffusion in α- and γ-Iron

Abstract

SEVERAL points urgently require clarification following my recent exchange of communications with Mr. Tamers1,2. First and most important, the limited available evidence does indeed suggest that a difference of several orders of magnitude exists between γ- and α-phase of iron for diffusion constants of hydrogen at room temperature. It is, of course, the room-temperature behaviour which is relevant for the problem of loss on Earth. Mr. Tamers quotes the paper of Sykes, Burton and Gegg3 as showing that these two diffusion constants differ by only a factor of 10 at 650° C. The identical equations and numbers from this paper demonstrate a difference of a factor of one million at room temperature (20° C).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tilles, D., Nature, 200, 563 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamers, M. A., Nature, 200, 564 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sykes, C., Burton, H. H., and Gegg, C. C., J. Iron and Steel Inst., 156, 155 (1947).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sieverts, A., Z. phys. Chem., 77, 591 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smithells, C. J., and Ransley, C. E., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 150, 172 (1935).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennek, H., and Klotzbach, G., Techn. Mitteilungen Krupp—Forschungberichte, 4, 47 (1941).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, E. W., and Hill, M. L., Trans. Met. Soc. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., 218, 1104 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, P. L., and Bennett, W. D. G., J. Iron and Steel Inst., 170, 205 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham, D., and Tomlin, D. H., Phil. Mag., 8, 1581 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wert, C. A., Phys. Rev., 79, 601 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells, C., and Mehl, R. F., Trans. Amer. Inst. Mining, Met., Petrol., Engrs., 140, 279 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bainbridge, A. E., Suess, H. E., and Wänke, H., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 26, 471 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Urey, H. C., and Mayeda, T., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 17, 113 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kvasha, L. G., Meteoritika, No. 20, 124 (1961).

  15. Ringwood, A. E., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 24, 159 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubost, H., and Lefort, M., Nature, 200, 566 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tilles, D., Nature, 194, 1273 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TILLES, D. Meteoritic Tritium and Diffusion in α- and γ-Iron. Nature 201, 808–809 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/201808a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/201808a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing