Abstract
ONE of the earliest papers1 on Rift Valley fever included pigs in the list of refractory species because Daubney, Hudson and Garnham2 had failed to elicit a clinical response in two pigs they had injected. Later, however, Weiss3 directed attention to the circumstantial field evidence that sows had aborted on farms in South Africa where sheep had died. Nevertheless, when Easterday, Murphy and Bennett4 injected three young pigs intraperitoneally with doses of 102.2 and 103.2 mouse LD50 of Rift Valley fever virus there was no clinical response, no viræmia and no development of antibody. Preliminary findings, herein recorded, suggest that the innate resistance of pigs is not absolute, the dose of virus being critical.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Findly, G. M., Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 25, 229 (1932).
Daubney, R., Hudson, J. R., and Garnham, P. C., J. Path. Bact., 34, 545 (1931).
Weiss, K. E., Bull. Epiz. Dis. Afr., 5, 431 (1957).
Easterday, B. C., Murphy, L. C., and Bennett, D. G., Amer. J. Vet. Res., 23, 1224 (1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SCOTT, G. Pigs and Rift Valley Fever. Nature 200, 919–920 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200919a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200919a0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.