Abstract
PREVIOUS work1–3 has established that xenoplastic implants made into the limbs of larval and adult urodeles would initiate the formation of accessory limb structures and, further4, that the position of the superficial wound used for insertion of the implanted material seemed to have a very decided effect on the stimulus-response system. The implants would not take advantage of wounds made proximal to the implant so readily as they would of distal wounds. In larvæ, as well as adults, very few growths were produced from proximal wound areas. These few supernumerary limbs which did form in association with proximal wounds, however, showed interesting growth patterns which are better understood to-day than they were at the time of the previous writing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ruben, L. N., J. Exp. Zool., 128, 29 (1955).
Ruben, L. N., Amer. Nat., 94, 427 (1960).
Ruben, L. N., and Stevens, J., J. Morph. (in the press).
Ruben, L. N., and Frothingham, M. L., J. Morph., 102, 91 (1958).
Needham, A. E., Regeneration and Wound-Healing, 73 (Methuen and Co., Ltd., London, 1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RUBEN, L., STEVENS, J. Wounds and the Polarity of Implant-induced Accessory Urodele Limbs. Nature 200, 797–798 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200797a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200797a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.