Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Extension and Retraction of the Tube-Feet of Ophiuroids

Abstract

THE greater part of the basic anatomy of ophiuroids was worked out in the latter half of the last century and the results summarized in Bronn1. Iri the water-vascular system, the absence of tube-foot ampullæ comparable with those of asteroids or echinoids is striking. It has been generally recognized that the feet are less important in locomotion than the arms, and they are frequently attributed only sensory and adhesive functions. In several common genera the tube-feet are small and show only slight changes of shape, although protraction has been recorded2,3. Perhaps for these reasons there has been little discussion of possible mechanisms of protraction and it seems often to have been tacitly assumed that none is present, and that retracted feet resume the extended condition only on relaxation of their musculature (which is wholly longitudinal), by the general pressure of the cœlomic fluid in the water-vascular canals or by the elasticity of the podial wall. Ludwig4 was the first to describe the valve at the head of the podium, the lips of which prevent water from flowing back into the radial canal. The presence of this valve has been remarked upon by all subsequent reviewers of the group; but its significance, namely, that pressure is developed within the foot, has been overlooked. Comparisons between active and anæsthetized specimens of various species suggest that in a number of cases podial extension is far in excess of that which could be achieved by relaxation alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ludwig, O., and Hamann, O., “Die Schlangensterne” in Bronn's Klassen (1901).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simroth, H., Z. wiss. Zool., 27, 417 (1876).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, J. E., J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K., 22, 345 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ludwig, O., Z. wiss. Zool., 34, 333 (1880).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fontaine, A. R. (personal communication, 1962).

  6. Spencer, W. K., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 235, 87 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fell, H. B., reported in The Times (December 21, 1961).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BUCHANAN, J., WOODLEY, J. Extension and Retraction of the Tube-Feet of Ophiuroids. Nature 197, 616–617 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/197616c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/197616c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing