Abstract
DURING the past decade an increasing number of experimental psychologists have returned to the problems raised by a human subject's reaction-time, the interval between the occurrence of a signal and the initiation of a response to it. Many recent investigations, such as those of Klemmer1,2, Karlin3, Drazin4, Bertelson and Boons5, Kay and Weiss6, have been concerned with the way in which reaction-time to a signal varies with the duration of the foreperiod, the interval between a warning signal and the signal to respond.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klemmer, E. T., J. Exp. Psychol., 51, 179 (1956).
Klemmer, E. T., J. Exp. Psychol., 54, 195 (1957).
Karlin, L., J. Exp. Psychol., 58, 185 (1959).
Drazin, D. H., J. Exp. Psychol., 62, 43 (1961).
Bertelson, P., and Boons, J.-P., Nature, 187, 531 (1960).
Kay, H., and Weiss, A. D., Nature, 191, 790 (1961).
Woodrow, H., J. Exp. Psychol., 17, 167 (1934).
Davis, R., L'Année Psychol. (in the press).
Fraisse, P., Psychologie du Temps (P.U.F., Paris. 1957).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DAVIS, R. Time Uncertainty and the Estimation of Time-intervals. Nature 195, 311–312 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/195311a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/195311a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
