Abstract
THE experimental work of Ancel1–3, Giraud4–5 and Landauer6–9 directed the attention of many workers to experimental teratology, and, in the past few years, many papers have been published dealing with the effects produced on the embryonic development of chicks, guinea pigs, mice and rabbits by nutritional deficit, antimetabolic drugs, sulphamides and some enzymatic systems. From all the data reported it transpires that: (1) There exists a close and direct relationship between dosage and the effects obtained, which only breaks down when marginal treatment is considered, namely, the use either of very low dosage which does not interfere with embryonic development, or of very high dosage which is always connected with the death of the embryos. (2) The alterations produced by each particular substance are different either qualitatively or quantitatively.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ancel, P., Ann. Endocrinol., 6, 1 (1955).
Ancel, P., La chémiotératogenèse. Réalisation des monstruosités par des substances chimiques chez les vertébrés (Ed. G. Doin, Paris, 1950).
Ancel, P., C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 234, 2134 (1952).
Giraud, A., Minerva Otorinolaringologica, 5, 3 (1955).
Giraud, A., and Martinet, M., Revue de stomatologia, 57, 454 (1936).
Landauer, W., J. Cell. Comp. Phys., 49, 261 (1954).
Landauer, W., J. Exp. Zool., 132, 95 (1958).
Landauer, W., and Rhodes, M. B., J. Exp. Zool., 119, 221 (1952).
Landauer, W., and de Franciscis, P., Nature, 183, 617 (1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DE FRANCISCIS, P., BOCCALATTE, F. Lead Acetate and Development of Chick Embryo. Nature 193, 989–990 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/193989a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/193989a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.