Abstract
IT is well known that flowering and fruiting processes bring about the senescence of most annual species of plants. Molisch1 interpreted this senescence as due to the mobilization of food materials into the fruits. His interpretation has been questioned by Leopold, Kamien and Janick2, for staminate as well as unpollinated pistillate plants of spinach show senescence after flowering. Both staminate and pistillate spinach plants develop a large seed stalk with the commencement of reproductive development, and it may be that Molisch's interpretation could be made more correct by including the mobilization of food materials into the stalk as an explanation of the imposition of senescence. The application of gibberellin to spinach which has not experienced photoperiodic induction will result in the formation of a stalk without the further development of flowers, providing an opportunity for distinguishing between the effects of bolting and of flowering on senescence.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Molisch, H., Der Lebenasdauer der Pflanze (G. Fischer Verlag, 1928).
Leopold, A. C., Niedergang-Kamien, E., and Janick, Jules, Plant Physiol., 34, 570 (1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JANICK, J., LEOPOLD, A. A Distinction between Bolting and Flowering Effects on Senescence. Nature 192, 887–888 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/192887b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/192887b0
This article is cited by
-
Correlative aging and transport of P32 in corn leaves under the influence of kinetin
Planta (1966)
-
Recent experimental studies of the shoot apex and shoot morphogenesis
The Botanical Review (1965)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.