Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Lymph Node Reactivity to Homografts of Cancellous Bone

Abstract

N. A. MITCHISON1 first showed that the power to transfer immunity caused by lymphosarcoma 6C3HEDto non-susceptible mice is confined to the lymph nodes draining the site of implantation. Billingham et al. 2 also found that in mice the tissues of the host which have the power to transfer immunity to skin homografts are the regional nodes and to a lesser degree the spleen. Gallone3 and his colleagues had previously shown that an increase in pyroninstaining cells occurred in the lymph nodes draining skin homografts. This work was confirmed and extended by Scothorne and McGregor4, who showed that in rabbits a considerable increase in weight occurred in lymph nodes draining homografts, but not autografts, of skin. Further, they showed that after homografting, great accumulations of ‘large lymphoid cells’ appeared in the cortex and to a lesser extent in the medullary cords of the draining lymph nodes. The cellular response waned rapidly with the onset of graft destruction, and within two days the nodes were largely depleted of pyroninophilic elements. Radici and Piredda5, also using rabbits, have described how, five days after a skin homograft, the reticular cells of the medullary cords of the first regional node are in large part replaced by pyroninophilic cells. Craigmyle6, however, using cartilage, was able to show that the weight changes and cyto-logical alterations in the regional lymph nodes occurred, but only in response to second-set homo-grafts and first-set heterografts of cartilage. He concluded that cartilage in the rabbit is only mildly antigenic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchison, N. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 142, 72 (1954).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Billingham, R. E., et al., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 143, 58 (1954).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallone, L., et al., Arch. Atti Soc. Ital. Chir., 2, 329 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scothorne, R. J., and McGregor, I. A., J. Anat. (Lond.), 89, 283 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Radici, G., and Piredda, A., Giornale Ital. di Dermat., 1, 49 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craigmyle, M. B. L., J. Anat. (Lond.), 92, 75 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, R. A., “Statistical Methods for Research Workers”, tenth ed. (Oliver and Boyd, 1946).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURWELL, R., GOWLAND, G. Lymph Node Reactivity to Homografts of Cancellous Bone. Nature 188, 159–160 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/188159a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/188159a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing