Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Kinetic Evidence for New Participants in the Hill Reaction

Abstract

A SIMPLE method for obtaining non-stationary kinetic data from photo-reactions is to use periodic illumination. The photosynthetic process of Chlorella and other algæ has been extensively studied in this way. The results have been confusing in that different relationships between the photosynthetic yield per flash and the interval between flashes (t d) have been observed. They can be divided into two categories depending upon whether the period of illumination was short (10 µsec. per flash) or long (1 m.sec. per flash or greater). Under conditions of short flashes, the yield per flash reached a maximum value when t d was about 0.03 sec. ; further increase of t d did not change the yield, nor was the maximum yield altered by variation of temperature1–3. With long flashes at high light intensities, greater values of t d were required to secure greater maximum yields per flash than observed with short-period illumination4–6. There has been controversy as to the source of the latter observation ; some authors believing that the carbon dioxide-reducing system of Chlorella is involved, while others single out reactants common to both photosynthesis and the Hill reaction3–7. The latter reaction, named after its discoverer, Dr. Robert Hill8, consists of the photolysis of water by isolated chloroplast preparations or whole Chlorella cells upon illumination in solutions of certain oxidizing agents. There is no participation of carbon dioxide.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emerson, R., and Arnold, W., J. Gen. Physiol., 15, 391 (1932); 16, 191 (1932).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clendenning, K. A., and Ehrmantraut, H. C., Arch. Biochem., 29, 387 (1950).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrmantraut, H., and Rabinowitch, E., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 38, 67 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briggs, G. E., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 130, 24 (1941).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weller, S., and Franck, J., J. Phys. Chem., 45, 1359 (1941).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamiya, H., and Chiba, Y., Studies Tokugawa Inst., 6, No. 2, Part 1 (1949).

  7. Rabinowitch, E., “Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.”, 2, 361 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill, R., Nature, 139, 881 (1937).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GILMOUR, H., LUMRY, R. & SPIKES, J. Kinetic Evidence for New Participants in the Hill Reaction. Nature 173, 31–32 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1038/173031b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/173031b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing