Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Pre-Clinical Studies

Pharmacokinetics of oral mycophenolate mofetil in combination with CsA in dogs after nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used successfully in solid organ transplantation (SOT) and more recently in nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for prophylaxis of graft rejection and acute graft-versus-host disease. However, the pharmacokinetics of MMF seem to differ when applied in HSCT compared to SOT. Here, we analyzed pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of MMF, in a nonmyeloablative canine HSCT model. Dogs received nonmyeloablative TBI for conditioning followed by leukocyte antigen-identical littermate HSCT and immunosuppression containing cyclosporin A (CsA) and different doses of MMF. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 2, 14 and 27. Dose escalation of MMF from 10 to 30 mg/kg tended to increase area under the curve (AUC) and the apparent oral clearance by 45 and 110%, respectively. Doses applied had no linear association with MPA concentration or blood trough level. No significant drug accumulation occurred over time. Using a twice daily MMF regimen, we conclude that an AUC of 30–60 μg/ml h as recommended for SOT cannot be reached in HSCT. Toxicities did not permit single doses higher than 30 mg/kg. Thus, if larger AUCs are desired in order to assure sufficient immunosuppression in HSCT, MMF might have to be administered at least three times daily.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sollinger HW, Belzer FO, Deierhoi MH, Diethelm AG, Gonwa TA, Kauffman RS et al. S-61443 (mycophenolate mofetil). A multicenter study for refractory kidney transplant rejection. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 513–518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ensley RD, Bristow MR, Olsen SL, Taylor DO, Hammond EH, O'Connell JB et al. The use of mycophenolate mofetil (RS-61443) in human heart transplant recipients. Transplantation 1993; 56: 75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Staatz CE, Tett SE . Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007; 46: 13–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Storb R, Yu C, Wagner JL, Deeg HJ, Nash RA, Kiem HP et al. Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism in DLA-identical littermate dogs given sublethal total body irradiation before and pharmacological immunosuppression after marrow transplantation. Blood 1997; 89: 3048–3054.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maris MB, Niederwieser D, Sandmaier BM, Storer B, Stuart M, Maloney D et al. HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2003; 102: 2021–2030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson P, Rogosheske J, Barker JN, Green K, Ng J, Weisdorf D et al. Relationship of mycophenolic acid exposure to clinical outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005; 78: 486–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenke A, Renner U, Richte M, Freiberg-Richter J, Platzbecker U, Helwig A et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Clin Transplant 2001; 15: 176–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giaccone L, McCune JS, Maris MB, Gooley TA, Sandmaier BM, Slattery JT et al. Pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil after nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2005; 106: 4381–4388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 2005; 438: 803–819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mack GS . Cancer researchers usher in dog days of medicine. Nat Med 2005; 11: 1018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hilgendorf I, Weirich V, Zeng L, Koppitz E, Wegener R, Freund M et al. Canine haematopoietic chimerism analyses by semiquantitative fluorescence detection of variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism. Vet Res Commun 2005; 29: 103–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange S, Brandt B, Riebau F, Vogel H, Weirich V, Hilgendorf I et al. Hematopoietic cell lysate vaccinations and bone marrow enrichment with donor-derived dendritic cells for engraftment promotion after non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37 (Suppl 1): S62 (abstract 386).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw LM, Holt DW, Oellerich M, Meiser B, van Gelder T . Current issues in therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid: report of a roundtable discussion. Ther Drug Monit 2001; 23: 305–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nash RA, Johnston L, Parker P, McCune JS, Storer B, Slattery JT et al. A phase I/II study of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 495–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson P, Green K, Rogosheske J, Brunstein C, Ebeling B, DeFor T et al. Highly variable mycophenolate mofetil bioavailability following nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 47: 6–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Hest RM, Doorduijn JK, de Winter BC, Cornelissen JJ, Vulto AG, Oellerich M et al. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 2007; 29: 353–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain A, Venkataramanan R, Hamad IS, Zuckerman S, Zhang S, Lever J et al. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid after mycophenolate mofetil administration in liver transplant patients treated with tacrolimus. J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 41: 268–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Hest RM, van Gelder T, Vulto AG, Mathot RA . Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44: 1083–1096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bullingham RE, Nicholls AJ, Kamm BR . Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 34: 429–455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arns W, Cibrik DM, Walker RG, Mourad G, Budde K, Mueller EA et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil: review of the literature. Transplantation 2006; 82: 1004–1012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Langman LJ, Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, LeGatt DF, Kneteman NM, Yatscoff RW . Pharmacodynamic assessment of mycophenolic acid-induced immunosuppression by measurement of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in a canine model. Transplantation 1996; 61: 87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lupu M, McCune JS, Kuhr CS, Gooley T, Storb R . Pharmacokinetics of oral mycophenolate mofetil in dog: bioavailability studies and the impact of antibiotic therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 1352–1354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smak Gregoor PJ, van Gelder T, Hesse CJ, van der Mast BJ, van Besouw NM, Weimar W . Mycophenolic acid plasma concentrations in kidney allograft recipients with or without cyclosporin: a cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 706–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cattaneo D, Merlini S, Zenoni S, Baldelli S, Gotti E, Remuzzi G et al. Influence of co-medication with sirolimus or cyclosporine on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2937–2944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hohage H, Zeh M, Heck M, Gerhardt UW, Welling U, Suwelack BM . Differential effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on mycophenolate pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired kidney function. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 1748–1750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pawinski T, Durlik M, Szlaska I, Urbanowicz A, Majchrnak J, Gralak B . Comparison of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters in kidney transplant patients within the first 3 months post-transplant. J Clin Pharm Ther 2006; 31: 27–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Osunkwo I, Bessmertny O, Harrison L, Cheung YK, Van de Ven C, del Toro G et al. A pilot study of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in childhood and adolescent allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2004; 10: 246–258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maris MB, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, Maloney DG, Shizuru JA, Agura E et al. Unrelated donor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: the effect of postgrafting mycophenolate mofetil dosing. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 454–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hummel M, Yonan N, Ross H, Miller LW, Sechaud R, Balez S et al. Pharmacokinetics and variability of mycophenolic acid from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium compared with mycophenolate mofetil in de novo heart transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2007; 21: 18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Filler G . Drug interactions between mycophenolate and cyclosporine. Pediatr Transplant 2004; 8: 201–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pape L, Froede K, Strehlau J, Ehrich JH, Offner G . Alterations of cyclosporin A metabolism induced by mycophenolate mofetil. Pediatr Transplant 2003; 7: 302–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. John U, Ullrich S, Roskos M, Misselwitz J . Two-hour postdose concentration: a reliable marker for cyclosporine exposure in adolescents with stable renal transplants. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 1608–1611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the highly dedicated technicians of the shared animal facility of the University of Rostock. Furthermore we thank Dirk Steffen DVM for the veterinary support provided. This work was supported by grants of the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) JU 417/2-1, 2-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Junghanss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lange, S., Mueller, S., Altmann, S. et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral mycophenolate mofetil in combination with CsA in dogs after nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 41, 667–674 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705958

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links