Abstract
IN the past, the discovery of any man-like fossil has signalled the beginning of extended and heated controversy. After reading numerous recent publications on the South African ‘man-apes’, we have come to feel that history is repeating itself. The great importance of this remarkable series of fossils is being obscured by technical argument over minor points and by the creation of genera, and even subfamilies, of doubtful utility. The present controversies over the South African fossils started before the discovery of many of the best preserved and most critical specimens, and a general statement of opinion now may help to orientate discussion when these latest finds are described in detail. The basic ideas expressed here are not new, but the emphasis is perhaps different.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WASHBURN, S., PATTERSON, B. Evolutionary Importance of the South African ‘Man-apes’. Nature 167, 650–651 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1038/167650a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/167650a0
This article is cited by
-
Zur Anatomie des Schädels von Australopithecus (Zinjanthropus) boisei aus der Olduvaischlucht in Ostafrika
Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde (1972)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.