Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetical Reduction of a Reproductive Unit in Relation to the Male–Female Ratio

Abstract

IN two previous papers1,2, I have referred to artificial insemination from the genetical point of view and arrived at the conclusion that the genetical reduction it produces is its main disadvantage. Recently, Sir John Russell in a lecture on “World Population and World Food Supplies”3 gave hopes of a better future. Referring to artificial insemination he said : “We may yet live to see bulls, other than a small select aristocracy, become unwanted anachronisms”. My own opinion is that even in cattle democracy is a fundamental necessity, therefore I fully share Sir John's “lurking suspicion that Nature may resent being unceremoniously bundled out in this way”, as he states a few lines after his rather sweeping statement. Nature would resent the genetical reduction produced by the increase of females in the ratio of 1 male to n females.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rabasa, S. L., An. Soc. Rural Argentina, 82, No. 12 (1948).

  2. Rabasa, S. L., Ciencia e Invest., 6, 204 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, E. J., Nature, 164, 379 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RABASA, S. Genetical Reduction of a Reproductive Unit in Relation to the Male–Female Ratio. Nature 166, 821–822 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1038/166821a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/166821a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing