Abstract
IN their differences these two books bring out very clearly the difficulties that beset the teacher of historical geology (stratigraphy) to-day. An ever-increasing knowledge of the detail of local successions, and the recognition of a multitude of folding phases, combine to blur the once clear impression of stratigraphic divisions delineated by Nature with bold strokes across the whole earth. It is obvious that even the honours student cannot be expected to learn ‘world stratigraphy’ on the old lines ; the problem then becomes one of selection and deliberate omission, of so presenting the partial picture that the result is a balanced whole.
Introduction to Historical Geology
By Raymond Cecile Moore. Pp. ix + 582. (New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1949.) 30s.
Emanuel Kayser's Abriss der Geologie
Sechste gänzlich neu bearbeitete Auflage. Von Prof. Dr. Roland Brinkmann. Band 2: Historische Geologie, (Pp. vii + 356. (Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1948.) 27 D. marks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WOOD, A. Introduction to Historical Geology Emanuel Kayser's Abriss der Geologie. Nature 164, 85–86 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/164085a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/164085a0