Abstract
INVESTIGATIONS recently carried out on the variation with temperature of the magnetic susceptibility of annealed and cold-worked copper have shown a different temperature-dependence in the two cases. A qualitative attempt is made to account for the difference on present theoretical lines.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
07 June 1947
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/159772f0
References
Hutchison, T. S., and Reekie, J., J. Sci. Instr., 23, 209 (1946).
Reekie, J., and Hutchison, T. S., Nature, 157, 807 (1946).
Bitter, F., Phys. Rev. 36, 978 (1930).
Lowance, P. E., and Constant F. W., Phys. Rev., 38, 1547 (1931).
Kussman, A., and Seemann, H. J., Naturwiss., 19, 309 (1931) Z. Phys., 77, 567 (1932).
Stoner, E. C., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 152, 672 (1935).
Sucksmith, W., Phil. Mag., 2, 21 (1926).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HUTCHISON, T., REEKIE, J. Temperature-Dependence of Magnetic Susceptibility of Annealed and Cold-worked Copper. Nature 159, 537–538 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1038/159537a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/159537a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
