Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Social Research and its Organisation

Abstract

THE report of the Clapham committee1 just issued has to a hend several controversies about the promotion, financing and organisation of in the social sciences. This committee on “the Provision for Social and Economic Research”, of wnich the late Sir John Clapham was chairman, was appointed by the Lord President of the Council and the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the Coalition government and consisted in leading social scientists, economists and economic historians. But they cannot be accused of overstating the case for developing their own sciences on a scale bearing comparison 369 with the development of the natural sciences. Just before the Second World War, as the Committee shows, there was virtually no comparison at all. In 1938–9 universities other than Oxford and Cambridge spent £987,000 on pure science, £886,000 on medicine and £116,000 on the social sciences, and probably a much lower proportion of these sums went into research in the case of the social than the natural sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Privy Council Office: Treasury. Report of the Committee on the Provision for Social and Economic Research. (Cmd. 6868.) Pp. 16. (London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1946.) 3d. net.

  2. Committee's Report on Scientific Research on Human Institutions, The Advancement of Science, Aug. 1943 (British Association); Nature, 152, 669 (1943).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FLORENCE, P. Social Research and its Organisation. Nature 158, 368–370 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1038/158368a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/158368a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing