Abstract
THE wording used by Krishnan and Ramanathan was “the centre of this fall (i.e. between the absorption maxima at 1285 and 1376 cm.1) coincides with the Raman frequency at 1332 cm.1”. Not unnaturally I took this to mean the minimum of absorption between these two peaks. Apparently what Krishnan and Ramanathan meant was the centre of the side of the band with peak at 1285 cm.1. But this is an equally untenable position. All the arguments in my earlier letter still hold if one replaces “minimum of absorption" by "centre of the long-wave side of the absorption maximum”. Even their much milder statement in the above letter that “the absorption associated with the 1332 cm.1 frequency is an integral part of the 8µ band” is open to question, as it depends on (a) the resolving power of the spectrometer used, and (b) the temperature at which the measurements are made.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SUTHERLAND, G. Infra-Red Absorption Spectrum of Diamond. Nature 157, 582–583 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1038/157582c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/157582c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.