Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Prenatal Mortality and the Birth-Rate

Abstract

MAXIMUM reproductivity in a monogamous society requires that males and females of appropriate age shall be available in approximately equal numbers. A considerable excess of one sex or the other will decrease the reproduction-rate. In practice, there rarely seems to be an excess of males of this age; among European races a slight excess of females is usual.War, or other events involving a differential toll of men of reproductive age, naturally exaggerate the excess of females. In England and Wales before the War of 1914–181, there was an excess of some 649,000 or 8·7 per cent of females over males, at ages 20—45 years. For several years after 1918 the excess was more than a million, being about 1,050,000, or 13·4 per cent in 19252. Ten years later, in 19353, the effects of the war were disappearing and the excess of females was down to 658,000, or 7·9 per cent, but it may well increase again considerably as a result of the present War. The surplus women, on statistical grounds alone, are evidently unable to get married in Great Britain, and the great majority of them, therefore, are sociologically sterilized. The number represents an appreciable percentage of the females of reproductive age, and this sociological sterility is a not inconsiderable factor in birth-rate problems. Groome4 calculated that an increase in the net reproduction-rate of some 15 per cent would be expected to result from equalizing the numbers of males and females of reproductive age, even without any increase in the total population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Registrar General's Statistical Review, 1913.

  2. Registrar General's Statistical Review, 1925.

  3. Registrar General's Statistical Review, 1935.

  4. Groome, J. R., Eug. Rev., 29, 154 (1937).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, W. T., J. Hygiene, 36, 381 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, W. J., Lancet, 245, 807 (Dec. 25, 1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parkes, A. S., Biol. Rev., 2, 1 (1926).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Auerbach, E., Arch. f. Rassen. und Gesellschafts Biol., 9, 10 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tschuprow, Al. A., Bull. Inst. Int. Stat., 20, 378 (1915).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parkes, A. S., J. Genetics, 14, 39 (1924).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PARKES, A. Prenatal Mortality and the Birth-Rate. Nature 153, 245–246 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/153245a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/153245a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing