Abstract
DR. BLAKESLEE is surprised that there is not a higher degree of unanimity of the Supreme Court of the United States1, but a believer in the subjectivity of opinion would expect very much what Dr. Blakeslee records in the tantalizingly few data he gives. In some matters there can scarcely be two opinions. But the ordinary matters of government are commonly settled by committee decisions-of which those of the Supreme Court are a type-or else by the decision of some one man. If the values of the opinions of men inter pares are equal, one would premise first, that a wrong decision is equally as likely to emerge as a right one from subjective processes ; and secondly, in relation to complex and obscure questions such as those with which superior courts necessarily deal, that the voting would correspond to some distribution of mathematical probability. Some critiques of examination results (“examinations of examiners”) support these views2. It would be interesting to know how often a decision of a lower court of law is reversed or upheld by a higher.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
NATURE, 149, 288 (1942).
NATURE, 136, 966 (1935).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
NICOL, H. Committee Decisions and Mathematical Statistics. Nature 149, 473 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1038/149473a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/149473a0
This article is cited by
-
Amino Acids and the Human Being
Nature (1942)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.