Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

[Letter to Editors]

Abstract

IT appears that scientific men are divided into two classes: the experimental type and the theoretical type. The difference would seem rather a matter of temperament than of necessity. Perhaps it would be wiser to separate them into two other classes which are rather of the same kind: those who are model makers and those who deal purely in abstract ideas and the essential relation of things.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ECKERSLEY, T. [Letter to Editors]. Nature 148, 255–256 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1038/148255b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/148255b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing