Abstract
IT appears desirable that we reply, though very briefly, to the comments that have appeared in NATURE1,2 on our first note3 on this subject and which were evidently written before our second and supplementary note4 had been published. Our purpose in these communications was very definite, namely, to indicate it as a necessary consequence of classical optics and of quantum mechanics that there should be two types of X-ray reflection in crystals, due respectively to static and to dynamic stratifications of electron density; in the language of quantum mechanics, these correspond respectively to an elastic collision of the photon with the crystal lattice and to an inelastic one in which part of the energy of the photon is transferred to the crystal as an optical vibration of its lattice structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Knaggs, Lonsdale, Müller and Ubbelohde, NATURE, 145, 821 (1940).
Zachariasen, NATURE, 145, 1019 (1940).
Raman and Nilakantan, NATURE, 145, 667 (1940).
Raman and Nilakantan, NATURE, 145, 860 (1940).
Faxen, Z. Phys., 17, 266 (1923).
Zachariasen, Phys. Rev., 57, 597 (1940).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAMAN, C., NILAKANTAN, P. Classical and Quantum Reflections of X-Rays in Crystals. Nature 146, 686 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/146686b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/146686b0
This article is cited by
-
Quantum theory of X-ray reflection: Experimental confirmation
Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section A (1941)
-
Diffuse Reflections on Laue Photographs
Nature (1940)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.