Abstract
THE reference which Dr. Lanchester thinks may give a wrong impression was founded on his Appendix IX, interpreted by the aid of p. x of the preface—” the later discussion (Chapter xiii), in which the doctrines of general curvature and expansion are discredited”—and of pp. 13 and 124—” it is clearly without meaning to talk of the expansion of the Universe unless some part of the Universe be excluded from the general expansion with which to make comparison, and then it is no longer an expansion of the Universe”. If my interpretation was wrong, I must express my regrets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
P., H. Back to Minkowski. Nature 136, 760 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136760b0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136760b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.