Abstract
THE discussion on this topic, held on September 5 at the Norwich meeting of the British Association, has revealed a far greater measure of agreement between geologists and archseologists than has emerged during any previous review of the subject. The division of the East Anglian glacial deposits into four distinct groups has provided a framework into which most of the archseological finds appear to fit quite naturally; it is thus not surprising that discussion should now centre around the more obvious of the remaining doubts and difficulties.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SOLOMON, J. Geological Relations of Early Man in East Anglia. Nature 136, 502–503 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136502a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136502a0