Abstract
ANALYSIS shows that an inverse relation exists between the amount of daylight and the price of hens' eggs in successive months of the year. That in turn is correlated with the amount of food a hen may eat per day, so that the more light, the more food, and, other things being equal, the more eggs. Artificial lighting has been used on a large scale in the United States to shorten the long nights and induce hens to lay more, but it cannot be said to be a common practice in Britain. The results obtained by J. W. Rhys and Raymond T. Parkhurst at the National Institute of Poultry Husbandry suggest, however, that its use might well be extended (Bull. No. 6). During the winter months the 120 pullets under lights laid 950 more eggs than an equal number without lights. For the 48 weeks of the test the lighted pen yielded 1086 eggs more than the unlighted pen. The lighted pullets laid an average of 173.5 eggs and the unlighted 161.0 eggs. Financially, the ‘morning and evening lights’ pen was most successful, the margin of profit over food and lighting costs being 11.58 pence a dozen eggs. Hens apparently give the best results under a 14-hour day.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Light upon Eggs. Nature 129, 431 (1932). https://doi.org/10.1038/129431c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/129431c0