Abstract
IN Prof. Fairfield Osborn's address on “The Discovery of Tertiary Man” (NATURE, Jan. 11, p. 55), it is stated, in regard to the discoveries I have made in East Anglia, that Prof. Breuil “shifts the entire pre-Chellean and Chellean flint industries from mid-Quaternary down into the base of Quaternary time, namely, into the first Interglacial or Mindel-Riss stage”. The first inter-glacial is, however, that of the Günz-Mindel—according to the Penckian scheme—and it is to this phase—represented in East Anglia by the Cromer Forest Bed—that Breuil now relegates the Chellean industry. Prof. Osborn had no doubt in mind Breuil's recently published list of his scientific papers when writing the address referred to, as in this list the impression is given, no doubt unintentionally, that the author was the first to refer the Chellean implements to the first inter-glacial epoch. This impression is, however, incorrect, as no less than ten years ago, in 1920, I published a note in the Geological Magazine (vol. 57, No. 671; May 1920, pp. 221–224), in which, with much detail, I set forth my views on the relationship of palæolithic man to the glacial period, and stated (p. 223) that “The Chellean implements may therefore be of Günz-Mindel inter-glacial age”. When I made this announcement, to which I have adhered with ever-increasing conviction, few, if any, archæologists agreed with my opinion, and it was only after several visits of Prof. Breuil to East Anglia that he was convinced of its truth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MOIR, J. Tertiary Man. Nature 125, 167 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1038/125167a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/125167a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.