Abstract
IT is probably evident to many others besides specialists how greatly the science of crystals has lately progressed by the introduction of the X-ray method. Brilliantly created some fifteen years ago by Laue, and simplified and developed by Sir William and W. L. Bragg, the method early led to convincing deductions of the atomic arrangements within certain crystals; and almost immediately was also applied by Moseley to the elucidation of the atom itself. After a marked pause due to the War, the method has been systematically developed in many directions, not least actively in its original role as a crystal probe. The purely crystal development has in fact been so rapid that a general halt is now recognisable, not in the number of workers or of their results, but in the kind of results. It is probably true to say that there has been no advance in principle for the last three years.
The Nature, Origin, and Interpretation of the Etch Figures on Crystals
By Prof. Arthur P. Honess. Pp. xiii + 171. (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; London: Chapman and Hall, Ltd., 1927.) 17s. 6d. net.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
B., T. The Nature, Origin, and Interpretation of the Etch Figures on Crystals . Nature 121, 666–668 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/121666a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/121666a0