Abstract
I CAN only adhere to my original views as to atomic diameters. Prof. Eddington tries to challenge my position by arguments based on “the usual gas model.” By this I think he means his own gas model, which is of a very special and restricted type, and by no means characteristic of the general gaseous configurations of a star. I believe his difficulties arise solely from the defects of his own model.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JEANS, J. Liquid Stars and Atomic Volume. Nature 121, 496–497 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/121496b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/121496b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
