Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Manoilov and other ‘Chemical Sex Reactions’

Abstract

SINCE 1924, Joyet-Lavergne,1 working with plants and Protozoa, has been developing the view that in general female sexual cells are more reducing than male as judged by their effects on the colours of dyes; recently2 he considers that they contain more reduced glutathione because they give the colour reactions of this substance more strongly. In 1922, Manoilov3 developed a ‘test for sex ’in plants by an elaborate treatment of dyes of the rosaniline series as a result of which the female side was made to display the deeper colour, that is, the reverse of the Joyet-Lavergne effect; Satina and Demerec4 have confirmed and developed this test, applying it to animal tissues, and amongst others to the cladoceran Crustacea Moina and Daphnia.5 More recently, Falk and Lorberblatt,6 working again with animals (mammalian ovary and testis), have demonstrated that the test depends on an oxidation phenomenon, the more complicated Manoilov technique being replaceable by the oxidation of colourless p-leucaniline in the presence of sufficient ferric chloride by which the female side again produces the deeper colour of p-rosaniline and is therefore apparently more oxidising than the male; Falk and Lorberblatt also report an “interesting parallelism’ in that the extract of testis which they used was found to have considerable reducing power as shown by Tunnicliffe's method of estimating glutathione7 whilst the ovarian extract had none, and Sir Frederick Hopkins tells me that this disparity has been long familiar to him.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Toyet-Lavergne, C.R. Ac. Sci., Paris, 179, 1212; 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Toyet-Lavergne, C.R. Ac. Sci., Paris, 184, 1088; 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. O. Manoilov, Bull. Appl. Bot. Plant-Breeding, 13(2), 503; 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Satina and M. Demerec, Science (New York), 1925, p. 225.

  5. S. Satina, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 22, 466; 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. G. Falk and I. Lorberblatt, Brit. Jour. Exp. Biol., 4, 305; 1927.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. E. Tunnicliffe, Bioch. J., 19, 194; 1925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PERKINS, M. The Manoilov and other ‘Chemical Sex Reactions’. Nature 120, 654–655 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/120654a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/120654a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing