Abstract
THE difficulty in deciding a status of pollution in narrow waters is well illustrated by Prof. Meek's letter in NATURE of November 17, and the present writers hold that it is necessary to search widely and deeply before it is likely that the information desired will be obtained. Indeed, the first result of the formation of local sub-committees for the investigation of river pollution referred to by Prof. Meek has been to bring out the lack of critical and co-ordinated information regarding the biological, physical, and chemical conditions in fresh-water streams, rivers, and in estuaries. The absence of this kind of information must render much work on the conditions in polluted waters inconclusive or even futile. The present letter is therefore written to demonstrate in a general way the necessity for organised continuous work on the biological, physical, and chemical conditions in streams, rivers, and estuaries, whether polluted or not.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ORTON, J., LEWIS, W. A Plea for Continuous Fundamental Research on the Problems of River Pollution. Nature 113, 236–237 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/113236a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/113236a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.