Abstract
I ACCEPT Prof. Compton's correction of the phrase “completely opposed”; it is perhaps too strong a term to have used. Prof. Compton's letter, however, at least admits that the evidence from the botanical side is valueless as a critical test for or against Wegener's hypothesis, and emphasises the fact that supporters of that hypothesis must look elsewhere than to the facts of animal and plant distribution for positive evidence in its support. Zoologists and botanists are dependent on the geologist and geophysicist for the correct interpretation of the palæogeographical changes which have taken place in the earth, and must be guided by them in selecting the basis on which the known geographical distribution of living forms can be explained.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Botanical Aspects of Wegener's Hypothesis. Nature 111, 533–534 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1038/111533c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/111533c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.