Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Action of Cutting Tools

Abstract

IF Mr. Mallock's friction theory of cutting-tool action is valid, and if cutting tools are ever effectively lubricated, it would follow that the dry tool should have an angle different from that of the lubricated tool. But this is contrary to universal practice. The inference would then be that either the friction theory is unimportant and extremely incomplete, or that lubrication as practised by engineers is very ineffective. The latter view seems more correct, for the following reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROWELL, H. Action of Cutting Tools. Nature 110, 771–772 (1922). https://doi.org/10.1038/110771a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/110771a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing