Abstract
IT is stated in NATURE (November 18, p. 683) that "“The professional course has grown so full in the training of a medical student that it has become increasingly difficult to cover the ground and secure qualification in a reasonable time.” It seems that chemistry and physics are to be placed outside the professional curriculum, but biology is to be retained. A knowledge of chemistry and physics is necessary to the doctor; and much of the recent advance in both medicine and surgery is due to discovery in these sciences. But can any one tell us of what utility, practical or intellectual, is the biology which medical students learn—facts about the classification of plants, the vascular system of the sea-urchin, the digestive system of the leech, the bones in the cod's head, and so on? No one is a better physician or surgeon for such knowledge; and, therefore, since it has no bearing on later study and practice, it is forgotten as soon as the prescribed examinations are passed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
REID, G. Medical Education. Nature 110, 769–770 (1922). https://doi.org/10.1038/110769b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/110769b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.