Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Softening of Secondary X-Rays

Abstract

A NUMBER of experimenters have noticed that when a beam of X-rays or γ-rays traverses any substance, the secondary rays excited are less penetrating than the primary rays. Prof. J. A. Gray (Franklin Institute Journal, November, 1920) and the present writer (Phil. Mag., May, 1921, and Phys. Rev., August, 1921) have shown that the greater part of this softening is not due, as was at first supposed, to a greater scattering of the softer components of the primary beam, but rather to a real change in the character of the radiation. My conclusion was that this transformation consisted in the excitation of some fluorescent rays of wave-length slightly greater than that of the primary rays. Prof. Gray, on the other hand, showed that if the primary rays came in thin pulses, as suggested by Stokes's theory of X-rays, and if these rays are scattered by atoms or electrons of dimensions comparable with the thickness of the pulse, the thickness of the scattered pulse will be greater than that of the incident pulse. He accordingly suggests that the observed softening of the secondary rays may be due to the process of scattering.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COMPTON, A. The Softening of Secondary X-Rays. Nature 108, 366–367 (1921). https://doi.org/10.1038/108366b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/108366b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing