Abstract
WHILE not considering myself qualified to question the gain to scientific knowledge on the theoretical side which might accrue from the investigation of ocean tides, such as Prof. Proudman suggested in his article in NATURE of April 7, p. 176, I yet venture the opinion that for practical, utilitarian purposes co-ordinated study of the tidal phenomena at coastal observatories would be of greater value. The official predictions, based on extended local observations, attain such a remarkable degree of accuracy that the error is, in what we may term by courtesy normal weather, negligible. The trouble is that it is the unexpected, in the form of wind and barometrical change at critical times, that happens, and we have no formulæ at hand with which to apply corrections to predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
TENNANT, A. Ocean Tides. Nature 107, 299–300 (1921). https://doi.org/10.1038/107299c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/107299c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.