Abstract
THE correspondence in NATURE under this heading has been most instructive. The widely spread feeling that the Association fails as an organization to promote the growth of the scientific spirit could not well be more definitely brought to light, particularly as many who are known to hold strong views have refrained from expressing them; unfortunately, moral indecision is fast becoming a characteristic of our class. It is all very well tor the late secretary and the present holders of the office to hint that the recommendations cancel out; maybe they are different; nevertheless, excepting our dear old member, Father Cortie, who has the sense of humour on all occasions, everyone agrees that the Association does not touch the public.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ARMSTRONG, H. The British Association. Nature 106, 467–468 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/106467b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/106467b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.