Abstract
SIR E. RAY LANKESTER';S difficulties as to the origin of flint (NATURE, vol. xcix., p. 283) would be largely removed if it were more generally recognised that the vast majority of flints in all formations, excluding he occasional examples deposited along fjssures, are chemical replacements of the limestones in which they occur. Microscopic observation of thin sections has, of course, furnished the most powerful confirmation of this view. The difficulties as to the cause of such replacement are similar in the case of all “concretions” where the original rock-substance has been removed and new material has been substituted. We now know that even iron pyrites may thus replace silicates or quartz, and that massive crystalline ores need not represent the infilling of cavities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
COLE, G. The Origin of Flint . Nature 99, 324 (1917). https://doi.org/10.1038/099324b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/099324b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.