Abstract
(1) BY docility the author means “readiness to obey for the sake of obeying, avidity for commands and instructions, reluctance to accept responsibility or exercise initiative, inability to react against the pressure of autocratic authority”; and this is what is wrong with Germany, where a slavishly docile majority is as wax in the hands of a dogmatic and domineering minority. The Germans lost their early domestic freedom in becoming feudalised, and they failed to recover it because of the disruptive influences of tribalism. The ultra-docility has grown and is obvious today alike in the Army, with its “serf-like rank-and-file” and its “arrogant, overbearing caste of officers,” and in “an almost serf-like people,” which bows to the despotism of the Kaiser, the Junker, and the lords of commerce and finance “as to the gracious rule of a divinely instituted ‘State.’”
(1) The Nemesis of Docility: A Study of German Character.
By E. Holmes. Pp. vii + 264. (London: Constable and Co., Ltd., 1916.) Price 4s. 6d. net.
(2) La Guerre et la Pense Mdicale.
By Prof. Ricardo Jorge. Pp. 63. (Lisbon, 1916.)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
(1) The Nemesis of Docility: A Study of German Character (2) La Guerre et la Pense Mdicale. Nature 97, 299–300 (1916). https://doi.org/10.1038/097299a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/097299a0