Abstract
THE alleged inaccuracies of language in stating the assumed conditions of smoothness or roughness prevailing between two bodies in contact are unfortunately so common that it is the exception rather than the rule to find any problem in which these conditions are correctly worded. In working through a chapter of Besant's “Dynamics” with a class the other day, I came across no less than two problems in which a “perfectly rough” body was supposed to be in contact with a second body which in turn rested against a third “perfectly smooth” body. In these cases the framer of the question carefully avoided giving any information as to the roughness or smoothness of the middle body, so that the inaccuracy of language might easily be overlooked. But this does not apply to the following example:—
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fictitious Problems in Mathematics. Nature 72, 56 (1905). https://doi.org/10.1038/072056c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/072056c0
This article is cited by
-
Whittaker’s analytical dynamics: a biography
Archive for History of Exact Sciences (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.