Abstract
IN his first letter (p. 53), Prof. Perry very properly drew attention to the desirability of greater definiteness in the notation for partial differential coefficients in the case of functions of two variables, the essence of his remarks being that it is not enough merely to change d into ∂, but that the variable which is for the nonce held to be constant should also be indicated. Apropos of this, and for the sake of historical interest, I quoted from a paper since published (Proc. R.S. Edinb xxiv. pp. 151–194) a short paragraph regarding a passage1 in Jacobi's writings of the year 1841, and containing a footnote with an old suggestion on the matter of notation. In his second letter (p. 271), Prof. Perry undertakes to show that this latter notation is objectionable so far as thermodynamics is concerned, and not to be compared with that which he himself uses. I regret to have to say that I was quite satisfied with his notation, and had no intention whatever of bringing the two into comparison, mine having been designed for much more complicated cases than those which occur in ordinary text-books on thermodynamics. His words are:—
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MUIR, T. Symbol for Partial Differentiation. Nature 66, 520 (1902). https://doi.org/10.1038/066520a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/066520a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.