Abstract
As I am in full sympathy with Prof. Perry's views, my own training, somewhat on the lines suggested by him, may be of interest. I was once taught Euclid and thoroughly hated the subject. At thirteen I was sent to school in Germany, where I was taught geometry; it had so little resemblance to Euclid that I looked on it as a new subject and was delighted with it. After eighteen months I returned to England to serve my apprentice ship, but not before I had advanced as far as solid geometry, quadratic equations and trigonometry, and I believe that this early and rapid mathematical training was of inestimable advantage to me in the works. It seems unconsciously to have led me to look on practical subjects with so much of a mathematical feeling that even now my fellow engineers consider me very mathematical, yet all the subsequent mathematical training at college (Germany) only extended over another eighteen months, and I admit that I would have liked to have had more.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
STROMEYER, C. The Reform of Mathematical Teaching. Nature 62, 523 (1900). https://doi.org/10.1038/062523d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/062523d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.