Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

“The Story of Gloucester”

Abstract

MR. WHEELER, it must be assumed, is wishful to prove that the fatality amongst the vaccinated is as high, or at any rate is not lower than amongst the non-vaccinated. It is surely not necessary for him to separate vaccinated cases into those “with marks” and those with “no marks,” since to him it should be immaterial whether a patient be vaccinated or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

“The Story of Gloucester”. Nature 57, 537–539 (1898). https://doi.org/10.1038/057537c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/057537c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing