Abstract
WHAT I object to is not Mr. Bryan's reference to Wroblewski's work, but his statement (explicitly founded upon the absence of “fresh experiments”) that my conclusions “are not results of independent original investigation.” In his letter to NATURE of January 9, Mr. Bryan does not even attempt to justify this statement. My Bulletin paper was an abstract; in the full paper (Trans. Crac. Acad., vol. xxvii. p. 375), published May 1895, Wroblewski's work was quoted and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
NATANSON, L. The Critical Temperature of Hydrogen. Nature 53, 249 (1896). https://doi.org/10.1038/053249f0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/053249f0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.